I do. Dixon, in his Introduction to Scripture says, “That the early Protestant translations were full of gross errors no unprejudiced Protestant will now deny, and that these errors were willful, Ward, in his Errata, satisfactorily proves.” Bishop Ellicott, in his book, “Considerations on the Revision of the English Version,” says that the translation “yields erroneous doctrinal inferences not to be drawn from the original.” Blunt, in his “Key to the Knowledge and Use of the Bible,” says, “The characters of the translators were not such as to command the respect of men.” Robert Gell, chaplain to Archbishop Abbott, one of the revising committee, wrote of the discussions, “Truth was often outvoted. Dogmatic interests were in some cases allowed to bias the translation. The Calvinism of one party, the prelatic views of another, were both represented at the expense of accuracy.”
Radio Replies Volume 1 by Rev. Dr. Leslie Rumble MSC and Rev. Charles Mortimer Carty
🙏 PayPal Donation Appreciated
Related Posts:
- Does the present Archbishop of Canterbury enjoy the jurisdiction granted to his pre-reformation predecessors by the Pope, or is he linked with them only by orders
- The Archbishop of Peru was blessed by the Pope9 and died of poison forty-three days later.
- The constitution was changed by that very Augustine. The Church in England before him was not in communion with Rome.
- Understanding the Catholic Church's Stance on Reading Scripture in the Vernacular
- Hoiv does it help to know Hebrew or Creek?
- St. Peter means that the Prophets did not prophesy by their own will, but by the Holy Spirit. He does not refer to interpretation by us.
- May a Catholic read the correct Word of God, or only the Bible as written to suit the Catholic Church?
- Does not every Bishop swear to persecute and oppose all heretics, schismatics, and rebels against the Pope?
- 5 Amazing Facts About the Catholic Church
- First Pope - The Catholic Church has the Answer
- Why Catholics Carry Statues of Mary
- Is not the Douay Version a poorer rendering into English than the Protestant Version, apart from its Romish viewpoint?
- It is a source of revenue which no Priest dare fail to utilize. The selling of Masses must be most profitable.
- I object to the permission of mental restriction under any circumstances, since withholding part of the truth misleads the listener just as if the speaker had lied.
- Would you say that the Archbishop of Canterbury is preaching an anti-Christian doctrine?
- The Bible tells us to prove all things. I. Thess. V., 21. The Catholic Church demands that her adherents prove nothing, accepting all on her authority, and without question.
- Old Testament teaching is barbaric in parts; not in keeping with the New Testament; nor would God inspire such a record of outrageous crimes.
- Why do you omit from that Our Father the words "For thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory forever and ever."
- Why do you omit from that Our Father the words "For thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory forever and ever."
- Will you prove the reliability of the Gospels according to the five requirements outlined by yourself to a previous inquirer?