He says that the notion of faith in Christ being rewarded, whilst dependence upon reason, observation, and experience merits eternal punishment is too absurd to need refutation.

No one ever said that dependence upon reason, observation, and experience merits eternal punishment. Such an assertion proves that Ingersoll did not use reason, observation, or experience to find out the exact teachings of Christianity. He just wrote on, his prejudice supplying for reason in the construction of his nonsensical arguments.

Radio Replies Volume 1 by Rev. Dr. Leslie Rumble MSC and Rev. Charles Mortimer Carty

Disclaimer: This content strives to follow Catholic teachings, but any mistakes are unintentional. For full accuracy, please refer to official sources such as the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Always verify any Bible or Catechism quotes against the original text. To report any errors, please contact the Editor of The Catholic Answers at editor@thecatholicanswers.com

🙏 Support Catholic Answers – Donate via PayPal Now!

Select a Donation Option (USD)

Enter Donation Amount (USD)

Deepen your faith with the Catholic book we recommend below. It is an excellent resource that addresses many important questions and is perfect for sharing with family and friends. #CommissionsEarned

The Case for Catholicism - Answers to Classic and Contemporary Protestant Objections

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Thank you.

Scroll to Top